Difference between revisions of "Chinese sources on Africa"

From Chinese Sources on Maritime Asia
(Added table with source list and headings to text)
(Don J. Wyatt in byline)
 
(18 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://www.middlebury.edu/academics/hist/faculty/node/57361 Don Wyatt], Middlebury College
+
[[:Category:Don Wyatt|Don J. Wyatt]], Middlebury College
  
Owing to its geographical remoteness at the limits of what was then the known navigational world, Africa was the last frontier with which Chinese of the imperial period came into direct contact. Moreover, in contrast to its actual size, the “Africa” with which these Chinese travelers initially familiarized themselves was itself of fairly limited expanse, being no more than the littoral regions mainly north of the equator that form the East African coastline, the seaward-rimming lands that bound the Indian Ocean—then called by Chinese the “Western Sea” (Xiyang 西洋)—and that together form the most northerly portion of its westernmost bank. From the time that Chinese knowledge of it as a place was first acquired, no region represented more of an extreme to reach than did Africa. Consequently, even after they made actual landfall there, the Chinese would penetrate few other foreign territories with which they had dealings as tentatively and shallowly as those of Africa.
+
[[File:Tribute Giraffe with Attendant.jpg|thumb|Tribute giraffe by Shen Du (沈度, 1357–1434)]]
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
'''Africa''' was the last frontier with which Chinese of the imperial period came into direct contact, owing to its geographical remoteness at the limits of what was then the known navigational world. Moreover, in contrast to its actual size, the “Africa” with which these Chinese travelers initially familiarized themselves was itself of fairly limited expanse, being no more than the littoral regions mainly north of the equator that form the East African coastline, the seaward-rimming lands that bound the Indian Ocean—then called by Chinese the “Western Sea” (Xiyang 西洋)—and that together form the most northerly portion of its westernmost bank. From the time that Chinese knowledge of it as a place was first acquired, no region represented more of an extreme to reach than did Africa. Consequently, even after they made actual landfall there, the Chinese would penetrate few other foreign territories with which they had dealings as tentatively and shallowly as those of Africa.
  
 
== Tang to Song ==
 
== Tang to Song ==
 
The first certifiable reference in any Chinese source to an identifiably African land is datable to the Tang dynasty (618–907) and, moreover, quite specifically to a source produced during the ninth century. This Chinese work that first references Africa is the ''Youyang zazu'' 酉陽雑俎 [Youyang Mountain Miscellanies], which was authored by the unconventional scholar Duan Chengshi 段成式 (d. 863). From Duan’s singular reference and ensuing description of a kingdom called Bobali 撥拔力, in the region incorporated by what is now the northeastern “horn” of the Africa, we immediately learn two things. First, we learn that during the Tang, Africa was conceived as constituting neither a unitary geographical entity nor a continent but instead a mélange of geographically discrete but culturally amorphous or indistinguishable “countries” (''guo'' 國). Such was the conceptualization of Africa that would persist among Chinese for much of the succeeding Song dynasty (960–1279), or at least through early or Northern Song (960–1127) times. Second and just as important, however, we learn that, almost from the first, an expanding trade in goods—in this first instance of Bobali, in ivory and ambergris—was the overriding impetus for Chinese interest in any African locale. Interestingly, while representing a curiosity, the inhabitants of Africa—typified by their very different, distinctively dark complexions—intrigued the Chinese who first encountered them—and who were almost assuredly merchants—far less than what native commodities its lands might yield for commerce.
 
The first certifiable reference in any Chinese source to an identifiably African land is datable to the Tang dynasty (618–907) and, moreover, quite specifically to a source produced during the ninth century. This Chinese work that first references Africa is the ''Youyang zazu'' 酉陽雑俎 [Youyang Mountain Miscellanies], which was authored by the unconventional scholar Duan Chengshi 段成式 (d. 863). From Duan’s singular reference and ensuing description of a kingdom called Bobali 撥拔力, in the region incorporated by what is now the northeastern “horn” of the Africa, we immediately learn two things. First, we learn that during the Tang, Africa was conceived as constituting neither a unitary geographical entity nor a continent but instead a mélange of geographically discrete but culturally amorphous or indistinguishable “countries” (''guo'' 國). Such was the conceptualization of Africa that would persist among Chinese for much of the succeeding Song dynasty (960–1279), or at least through early or Northern Song (960–1127) times. Second and just as important, however, we learn that, almost from the first, an expanding trade in goods—in this first instance of Bobali, in ivory and ambergris—was the overriding impetus for Chinese interest in any African locale. Interestingly, while representing a curiosity, the inhabitants of Africa—typified by their very different, distinctively dark complexions—intrigued the Chinese who first encountered them—and who were almost assuredly merchants—far less than what native commodities its lands might yield for commerce.
  
If it actually occurred at all before the much later era of the Ming dynasty (1368–1644), we cannot determine precisely when Chinese first set foot on African soil. Still, there is an extant collection of unique sources from the late or Southern Song (1127–1279) and the intervening Yuan dynasty (1279–1368) periods—consisting preponderantly of nonofficial writings, mostly under the literary classification of “geographies” or “travelogues” (dili 地理)—that compellingly ascribes this event to pre-Ming times. Outstanding among the Southern Song sources of this type in their highly descriptive referencing of African sites are the works Lingwai daida 嶺外代答 [Notes on Lands beyond the Mountains] by Zhou Qufei 周去非 (jinshi, 1163) and Zhufan zhi 諸蕃志 [Description of Foreign Peoples] by Zhao Rugua 趙汝适 (1170–1231), which were authored in reputedly 1178 and 1226, respectively. The most salient of the Yuan-period works of this type is Daoyi zhilue 島夷志略 [Annals of Island Barbarians] by Wang Dayuan 汪大淵 (fl. 1340s), which was completed no later than 1349. Each of these works offers detailed descriptions of the peoples and products of multiple coastal African “countries” that are putatively based on firsthand observation.
+
If it actually occurred at all before the much later era of the Ming dynasty (1368–1644), we cannot determine precisely when Chinese first set foot on African soil. Still, there is an extant collection of unique sources from the late or Southern Song (1127–1279) and the intervening Yuan dynasty (1279–1368) periods—consisting preponderantly of nonofficial writings, mostly under the literary classification of “geographies” or “travelogues” (''dili'' 地理)—that compellingly ascribes this event to pre-Ming times. Outstanding among the Southern Song sources of this type in their highly descriptive referencing of African sites are the works ''Lingwai daida'' 嶺外代答 [Notes on Lands beyond the Mountains] by Zhou Qufei 周去非 (''jinshi'', 1163) and ''Zhufan zhi'' 諸蕃志 [Description of Foreign Peoples] by Zhao Rugua 趙汝适 (1170–1231), which were authored in reputedly 1178 and 1226, respectively. The most salient of the Yuan-period works of this type is ''Daoyi zhilue'' 島夷志略 [Annals of Island Barbarians] by Wang Dayuan 汪大淵 (fl. 1340s), which was completed no later than 1349. Each of these works offers detailed descriptions of the peoples and products of multiple coastal African “countries” that are putatively based on firsthand observation.
  
 
== Ming ==
 
== Ming ==
 
Subsequent sources indicate that by Ming times, and surely after 1405, the territories of northeast coastal Africa had become known, if not altogether familiar, landmarks for Chinese navigators. This certifiable visitation of the littoral kingdoms of the East African shoreline is closely associated with the noteworthy seagoing expeditions of the famous eunuch-commander Zheng He 鄭和 (1371–1435), and it is datable to the fifth of the seven voyages, from 1417 (actually, December 1416) to 1419. Thus, taking the time required to transverse the extreme navigational distance from South China to East Africa, it is most likely sometime during the year of 1418 that we can conclude with surety that detachments from the immense Ming flotilla must have touched such ports of call as Mogadishu (Mugudushu 木骨都束); Brawa, now more typically Barawa or Brava (Bulawaguo 卜剌哇國); and Malindi or formerly Melinde (Molin 磨鄰).
 
Subsequent sources indicate that by Ming times, and surely after 1405, the territories of northeast coastal Africa had become known, if not altogether familiar, landmarks for Chinese navigators. This certifiable visitation of the littoral kingdoms of the East African shoreline is closely associated with the noteworthy seagoing expeditions of the famous eunuch-commander Zheng He 鄭和 (1371–1435), and it is datable to the fifth of the seven voyages, from 1417 (actually, December 1416) to 1419. Thus, taking the time required to transverse the extreme navigational distance from South China to East Africa, it is most likely sometime during the year of 1418 that we can conclude with surety that detachments from the immense Ming flotilla must have touched such ports of call as Mogadishu (Mugudushu 木骨都束); Brawa, now more typically Barawa or Brava (Bulawaguo 卜剌哇國); and Malindi or formerly Melinde (Molin 磨鄰).
  
Thus, significantly, with the advent of the Ming dynasty and especially in the wake of the watershed naval missions of Zheng He, we no longer find such East African locations as the foregoing ones confined exclusively to the nonofficial travelogue literature. On the contrary, we find these and other African sites referenced for the first time in official sources, such as Ming shi 明史 [History of the Ming Dynasty]. Interestingly, therein, the products of these African lands—mostly raw materials and exotic animals but also some highly prized goods that we may consider either cured or finished—are described with greater detail than any aspect—whether cultural or ethnographical features—of the native inhabitants. We may take such a development as indicative of the level of familiarity that Chinese visitors had achieved with the geography of east coastal Africa by the commencement of the fifteenth century. Following the last of Zheng He’s visits in 1433, to be sure, there would be a hiatus in maritime contact between China and Africa of several centuries. Nonetheless, we must see the knowledge gained from this earliest Chinese direct engagement with Africa—a brief flourishing of interchange restricted entirely to the crucial epoch spanning from the late 1410s to the early 1430s—as presaging vital aspects of the largely transoceanic commercial relationship that we are witnessing the emergence and expansion of between China and the nation-states of Africa in our own times.
+
Thus, significantly, with the advent of the Ming dynasty and especially in the wake of the watershed naval missions of Zheng He, we no longer find such East African locations as the foregoing ones confined exclusively to the nonofficial travelogue literature. On the contrary, we find these and other African sites referenced for the first time in official sources, such as ''Ming shi'' 明史 [History of the Ming Dynasty]. Interestingly, therein, the products of these African lands—mostly raw materials and exotic animals but also some highly prized goods that we may consider either cured or finished—are described with greater detail than any aspect—whether cultural or ethnographical features—of the native inhabitants. We may take such a development as indicative of the level of familiarity that Chinese visitors had achieved with the geography of east coastal Africa by the commencement of the fifteenth century. Following the last of Zheng He’s visits in 1433, to be sure, there would be a hiatus in maritime contact between China and Africa of several centuries. Nonetheless, we must see the knowledge gained from this earliest Chinese direct engagement with Africa—a brief flourishing of interchange restricted entirely to the crucial epoch spanning from the late 1410s to the early 1430s—as presaging vital aspects of the largely transoceanic commercial relationship that we are witnessing the emergence and expansion of between China and the nation-states of Africa in our own times.
  
 
== Source list ==
 
== Source list ==
{| class="wikitable"
+
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|'''Title''' (pinyin)
+
!'''Title''' (pinyin)
|'''Title''' (hanzi)
+
!'''Title''' (hanzi)
|'''Title''' (English)
+
!'''Title''' (English)
|'''Author''' (pinyin)
+
!'''Author''' (pinyin)
|'''Author''' (hanzi)
+
!'''Author''' (hanzi)
|'''Date'''
+
!'''Date'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
|''[[Weilüe]]''
 
|''[[Weilüe]]''
 
|魏略
 
|魏略
|''Brief History of Wei''
+
|Brief History of Wei
 
|Yu Huan
 
|Yu Huan
 
|魚豢
 
|魚豢
|after 265
+
|265, after
 
|-
 
|-
 
|''Youyang zazu''
 
|''Youyang zazu''
 
|酉陽雑俎
 
|酉陽雑俎
|''Youyang Mountain Miscellanies''
+
|Youyang Mountain miscellanies
 
|Duan Chengshi
 
|Duan Chengshi
 
|段成式
 
|段成式
|ca. 855
+
|855, ca.  
 
|-
 
|-
|''Xin Tangshu''
+
|''Xin Tang shu''
 
|新唐書
 
|新唐書
|
+
|New History of Tang
 
|Ouyang Xiu, Song Qi, et al.
 
|Ouyang Xiu, Song Qi, et al.
 
|歐陽修, 宋祁
 
|歐陽修, 宋祁
Line 45: Line 48:
 
|''Zhufan zhi''
 
|''Zhufan zhi''
 
|諸蕃志
 
|諸蕃志
|
+
|Description of foreign peoples
 
|Zhao Rugua
 
|Zhao Rugua
 
|趙汝适
 
|趙汝适
|ca. 1225
+
|1225, ca.  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|''Yiyu zhi''
 
|''Yiyu zhi''
Line 59: Line 62:
 
|''Daoyi zhilue''
 
|''Daoyi zhilue''
 
|島夷誌略
 
|島夷誌略
|
+
|A brief account of island barbarians
 
|Wang Dayuan
 
|Wang Dayuan
 
|汪大淵
 
|汪大淵
Line 66: Line 69:
 
|''Xingcha shenglan''
 
|''Xingcha shenglan''
 
|星槎勝覽
 
|星槎勝覽
|
+
|Captivating views from a star raft
|Fei Xin
+
|Bi Xin
 
|費信
 
|費信
 
|1436
 
|1436
Line 76: Line 79:
 
|Lu Rong
 
|Lu Rong
 
|陸容
 
|陸容
|after 1493
+
|1493, after
 
|-
 
|-
 
|''Mingshi''
 
|''Mingshi''
 
|明史
 
|明史
|
+
|History of the Ming
|Zhang Tingyu, et al.  
+
|Zhang Tingyu, et al.
 
|張廷玉
 
|張廷玉
 
|1739 [1789]
 
|1739 [1789]
 
|}
 
|}
 +
__FORCETOC__
 +
__NOINDEX__
 +
[[Category:Africa]]
 +
[[Category:Tang]]
 +
[[Category:Song]]
 +
[[Category:Ming]]
 +
[[Category:Alexandria]]
 +
[[Category:Don Wyatt]]
 +
{{DEFAULTSORT:Africa}}

Latest revision as of 13:24, 24 July 2022

Don J. Wyatt, Middlebury College

Tribute giraffe by Shen Du (沈度, 1357–1434)


Africa was the last frontier with which Chinese of the imperial period came into direct contact, owing to its geographical remoteness at the limits of what was then the known navigational world. Moreover, in contrast to its actual size, the “Africa” with which these Chinese travelers initially familiarized themselves was itself of fairly limited expanse, being no more than the littoral regions mainly north of the equator that form the East African coastline, the seaward-rimming lands that bound the Indian Ocean—then called by Chinese the “Western Sea” (Xiyang 西洋)—and that together form the most northerly portion of its westernmost bank. From the time that Chinese knowledge of it as a place was first acquired, no region represented more of an extreme to reach than did Africa. Consequently, even after they made actual landfall there, the Chinese would penetrate few other foreign territories with which they had dealings as tentatively and shallowly as those of Africa.

Tang to Song

The first certifiable reference in any Chinese source to an identifiably African land is datable to the Tang dynasty (618–907) and, moreover, quite specifically to a source produced during the ninth century. This Chinese work that first references Africa is the Youyang zazu 酉陽雑俎 [Youyang Mountain Miscellanies], which was authored by the unconventional scholar Duan Chengshi 段成式 (d. 863). From Duan’s singular reference and ensuing description of a kingdom called Bobali 撥拔力, in the region incorporated by what is now the northeastern “horn” of the Africa, we immediately learn two things. First, we learn that during the Tang, Africa was conceived as constituting neither a unitary geographical entity nor a continent but instead a mélange of geographically discrete but culturally amorphous or indistinguishable “countries” (guo 國). Such was the conceptualization of Africa that would persist among Chinese for much of the succeeding Song dynasty (960–1279), or at least through early or Northern Song (960–1127) times. Second and just as important, however, we learn that, almost from the first, an expanding trade in goods—in this first instance of Bobali, in ivory and ambergris—was the overriding impetus for Chinese interest in any African locale. Interestingly, while representing a curiosity, the inhabitants of Africa—typified by their very different, distinctively dark complexions—intrigued the Chinese who first encountered them—and who were almost assuredly merchants—far less than what native commodities its lands might yield for commerce.

If it actually occurred at all before the much later era of the Ming dynasty (1368–1644), we cannot determine precisely when Chinese first set foot on African soil. Still, there is an extant collection of unique sources from the late or Southern Song (1127–1279) and the intervening Yuan dynasty (1279–1368) periods—consisting preponderantly of nonofficial writings, mostly under the literary classification of “geographies” or “travelogues” (dili 地理)—that compellingly ascribes this event to pre-Ming times. Outstanding among the Southern Song sources of this type in their highly descriptive referencing of African sites are the works Lingwai daida 嶺外代答 [Notes on Lands beyond the Mountains] by Zhou Qufei 周去非 (jinshi, 1163) and Zhufan zhi 諸蕃志 [Description of Foreign Peoples] by Zhao Rugua 趙汝适 (1170–1231), which were authored in reputedly 1178 and 1226, respectively. The most salient of the Yuan-period works of this type is Daoyi zhilue 島夷志略 [Annals of Island Barbarians] by Wang Dayuan 汪大淵 (fl. 1340s), which was completed no later than 1349. Each of these works offers detailed descriptions of the peoples and products of multiple coastal African “countries” that are putatively based on firsthand observation.

Ming

Subsequent sources indicate that by Ming times, and surely after 1405, the territories of northeast coastal Africa had become known, if not altogether familiar, landmarks for Chinese navigators. This certifiable visitation of the littoral kingdoms of the East African shoreline is closely associated with the noteworthy seagoing expeditions of the famous eunuch-commander Zheng He 鄭和 (1371–1435), and it is datable to the fifth of the seven voyages, from 1417 (actually, December 1416) to 1419. Thus, taking the time required to transverse the extreme navigational distance from South China to East Africa, it is most likely sometime during the year of 1418 that we can conclude with surety that detachments from the immense Ming flotilla must have touched such ports of call as Mogadishu (Mugudushu 木骨都束); Brawa, now more typically Barawa or Brava (Bulawaguo 卜剌哇國); and Malindi or formerly Melinde (Molin 磨鄰).

Thus, significantly, with the advent of the Ming dynasty and especially in the wake of the watershed naval missions of Zheng He, we no longer find such East African locations as the foregoing ones confined exclusively to the nonofficial travelogue literature. On the contrary, we find these and other African sites referenced for the first time in official sources, such as Ming shi 明史 [History of the Ming Dynasty]. Interestingly, therein, the products of these African lands—mostly raw materials and exotic animals but also some highly prized goods that we may consider either cured or finished—are described with greater detail than any aspect—whether cultural or ethnographical features—of the native inhabitants. We may take such a development as indicative of the level of familiarity that Chinese visitors had achieved with the geography of east coastal Africa by the commencement of the fifteenth century. Following the last of Zheng He’s visits in 1433, to be sure, there would be a hiatus in maritime contact between China and Africa of several centuries. Nonetheless, we must see the knowledge gained from this earliest Chinese direct engagement with Africa—a brief flourishing of interchange restricted entirely to the crucial epoch spanning from the late 1410s to the early 1430s—as presaging vital aspects of the largely transoceanic commercial relationship that we are witnessing the emergence and expansion of between China and the nation-states of Africa in our own times.

Source list

Title (pinyin) Title (hanzi) Title (English) Author (pinyin) Author (hanzi) Date
Weilüe 魏略 Brief History of Wei Yu Huan 魚豢 265, after
Youyang zazu 酉陽雑俎 Youyang Mountain miscellanies Duan Chengshi 段成式 855, ca.
Xin Tang shu 新唐書 New History of Tang Ouyang Xiu, Song Qi, et al. 歐陽修, 宋祁 1060
Zhufan zhi 諸蕃志 Description of foreign peoples Zhao Rugua 趙汝适 1225, ca.
Yiyu zhi 異域志 Zhou Zhizhong 周至中 1297-1329
Daoyi zhilue 島夷誌略 A brief account of island barbarians Wang Dayuan 汪大淵 1349
Xingcha shenglan 星槎勝覽 Captivating views from a star raft Bi Xin 費信 1436
Shuyuan zaji 菽園雑記 Lu Rong 陸容 1493, after
Mingshi 明史 History of the Ming Zhang Tingyu, et al. 張廷玉 1739 [1789]